Before getting into the narrative/exposé part of this project, I want
to first share a guiding notion that will remain prevalent throughout. Shamelessly,
I’ve lifted this directly from the pages of my MA thesis on three Canadian TV
commercials. There’s nothing as gratifying as recycling your own labour when it
has already been declared dead and forgotten.
If you don’t know what any of this is about, read the
previous post.
Presence emphasizes the choice to make positive and lasting
investments of time in the lives of one’s family members. In Proud Fathers, Lou’s stern, affirmative
presence in Jimmy’s formative years, as well as his covert presence at the
rink, is worth noting.
In A Bike Story, presence is demonstrated through silence. The
narrator’s modesty illustrated by his reluctance to ask his father for a bike
is in turn rewarded by his father’s decision to buy it for him. Silent presence
appears in the attitudes of both the boy and his father: the boy’s quiet
humility, patience and devotion to his father and the man’s silent awareness of
his son’s thoughts, wishes and credibility. Embedded in the dialogue and
scenario in Dieppe, presence can once
more be found. Mark’s conversation with his grandfather is mediated by the
distance between them. On a personal level, Mark communicates with his
grandfather to include a veteran first-hand voice from his own family into an
experience he has created in the spirit of past events. Dieppe is an important
place for Mark’s grandfather. It resides in his memory and in the memories of
others who lived through its darkest days. Part of his life remains there
despite that many of his compatriots lost their lives. Mark travels to be close
to that memory. Steps are retraced, the town is explored, and sand and stones
on the beach are physically touched, picked up. They are the sediment of the
foundation upon which this memory was created, long before Mark’s birth. This
memory was then supplanted into his mind through stories narrated by his
grandfather. Therefore, by placing a long distance phone call, Mark is able to
be remotely present for his grandfather, and reciprocally and involuntarily,
his grandfather is spiritually present in Dieppe for Mark.
Through the notion of presence and
the different ways of being present (for one another), the characters’ personal
ethics within the narratives can be illustrated and typified. Furthermore,
these depictions of ideal forms of presence are the first step in the process
of collective identification.
While collective identification may not be my focus here, personal identification molded by
meaningful relationships to others, be they positive or frictional, best suits this
particular idea of presence. Presence
is love in its many forms. It is life-sustaining and preserving. It is, in a
very fundamental way, a linear facilitation of the basic need of self-making.
An extreme example comes to mind.
One summer there was suddenly a
family of squirrels living in the awning above the front door at our house.
This is because, when building it, my father mistakenly left a three inch
opening just above the storm drain. Sitting out on the front porch we could
hear them running around inside the large triangular space above our heads. I
wondered how any animal could see in there, as they seemed to be located beyond
the archway that would cut off what little light the entrance could possibly
provide. We would hit the ceiling with our hockey sticks, laughing at the
ensuing audible fuss. Sometimes when I was quiet I would find the mother
squirrel sitting sentinel with her nose jutting out from the opening. I would
carefully leave almonds and peanuts on the branch saddles of the large magnolia
jumping distance from the hole, only to sit back and watch as she cautiously
collected all of them, freezing still at equal intervals, her senses on high
alert.
My
father boarded it up eventually, but not without a struggle that demonstrates
the kind of panic a mammal parent has toward its young. For days, the squirrel gnawed
at the half-inch slice of particleboard, littering a bed of sawdust on the
ground beneath, in order to create an opening just large enough to squeeze
through. I imagine the babies lived through the ordeal since no smell of decay
or spike in housefly numbers occurred. After that, it was business as usual. I’m
not a naturalist but I imagine that after a while, those little ones, however
many, were by the summer’s end old enough to climb down and start living
autonomously.
One
November evening, when the temperature dipped well below zero overnight, I
arrived home for dinner, the street dark. After I walked inside, my brother
pointed out that I had just walked past two young squirrels parked on our front
porch. We could see them clearly from the window. They were nestled quite
tightly together, bracing for a cold night. Why had they had not scattered when
I was keying the lock? Had I stepped five inches to the right I might have
flattened a tail. I got down on the floor and put my face right up against the
glass. The pane was all that separated us. I knocked. One of them looked
frightened, concerned for the other, who was virtually immobilized with what
looked like a terminal disease, but conscious nonetheless. These two were
siblings and I was willing to bet nice dinners for a year that they were the
summer pups that had lived seven feet above their current uncertainty.
Fascinated,
I grabbed a small blanket and a shoebox, closing off the window gap with the lidless
box and throwing the blanket on top of the squirrels. The caretaker worked
furiously – really, what luck to have a makeshift shelter fall out of the sky –
to entangle its sibling into warmth and security. A frozen breeze still made
its way through gaps in the shell, rippling the blanket. The able-bodied
sibling braced for a tragic night, staring at me sidelong with its one visible
eye, the other squirrel fading away, twitching less with each passing moment,
eyes greyed over, waiting for an impending appointment.
In my
neighbourhood, squirrels did not trust humans like those in an Algonquin camp
site who stage territorial feuds, scream from the tops of trees and beg for
scraps of bread and fruit. Pointe-Claire squirrels remained pinned to the
sanctity of thinner treebark if people were anywhere within earshot. To
dispense with their dependence on the ground they created highways along
branches and electrical wires spanning almost the entire block, hardly needing
little more than a two-metre leap of faith at the most. The scene in the front
door window, however, reminded me that personal tragedy transcends levels and
lines of nature and habit to disassemble barriers, and that those in dire
circumstances can be driven to reach for olive branches from the devil’s mouth.
As a real life metaphor, it also revealed the most basic operation of the
notion of presence down to the last
transmissions of a flickering flame. We are present in spirit, in growth, in
deed and in death. We are visible to one another; we undergo radical passage in
communion, in concert. Even major movements achieved through solitary action
rely strongly at the fringe, in the margins, on interaction, fleeting human
companionship, favours taken and offered, regardless of the terms of social contract.
I woke up
late the next morning to the sounds of my grandmother rearranging pots and pans.
When I asked her about the previous night’s squatters, she reported to have
thrown the dead squirrel, wrapped in its small blanket, into the garbage, shoebox
and all, its companion absent; a dark chapter in an already spirited family
saga, of which we would never see the next installment.
No comments:
Post a Comment